« Choose a Snooze | Home | The Patagonia—WHUUUUUUUT? »

Aug 28, 2008

Ye Olde Quteness

It's Circa 1925, People, and Thee Quteness is alive and well, according to Shorpy.com.

Just like this century, fine folks bottle-fed their piglets.


Oh, and took them for walkies.


Sender Inner Brinke G. From Shorpy, the 100-year-old-photo blog.

Email to a Friend | Add to del.icio.us |


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ye Olde Quteness:


Lath and plaster bleeny snacks! I love how the chauffeur is standing by holding the piggy's bottie ready for Madame.

[Don't do it. Just don't. - Ed.]
[ http://www.squidgrid.com/cute/Glossary.htm#FP ]

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 05:19 AM

Cute peegy!

As to its hooMom - Let the nuffs begin!

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 05:22 AM

Am I wrong, or does this peeg have a gem studded harness?

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 05:23 AM



The pet store in our mall has piggies. I could hover over their cages and listen to their sweet baby peeg grunting noises all day.

I don't think they'd get along so well with the cats though.

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 05:25 AM

Hamlet strolls the hamlet.

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 05:26 AM

Love, love Shorpy.

I'm also rather fond of this Mr. McOinkerson.

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 05:37 AM

I looove these pics!!!

Lady Prunella Bassington: "Why, Henry!! You're eating like a pig!!"

Chauffeur: "Well, yes, Miss. After all, he IS a pig."

Lady Prunella: "Oh, quite right! I'd forgotten."

Gail (the first one)
 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 06:10 AM

love this picture- :)

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 06:12 AM

I love the little harness!!! So cute!!

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 06:13 AM

Everything about these pictures is absolutely perfect :-D

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 06:20 AM

Peeeg lofs his meelks.

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 06:25 AM

I just discovered Shorpy and I love it! This is not typical of some of the sad pictures of people. Can you say "eccentric rich".

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 06:27 AM

Richy McPiggersons looks quite happy! Clearly, having pigs for pets is not a new phenomenon! Adorable!

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 06:31 AM

We see pictured; Lady Evadne Kneetrembler Fitzwillmington Hypotherneuse, feeding her pet pig arthur, "He reminds me of my dear departed Husband Arthur, only his manners are better".

Hon Glad
 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 06:35 AM

And if you're not a pig person...

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 06:38 AM

This one is just begging for another one of Berthaservant's breeliant novellas!

I await...

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 06:46 AM

OMG, I want one. :) So cute!

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 07:03 AM

I really hope Aubrey sees this.

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 07:21 AM

How ironic, she's feeding and caring for an innocent baby piglet while wearing another innocent animal on her back that probably was skinned alive.

strange crazy world.

[Not a lot of vegetarians about in 1925 either. Over it yet? - Ed.]

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 07:36 AM

And while I kinda want to nuff about the lady's fur coat, I just can't! This McPiggerson is tooooo adorable.

Love the (eyepatch clad?) guard/army dude type holding the piggy's bottle.

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 07:36 AM

Awww, baby vintage piggie.

I'm really digging that woman's hat, too!

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 08:08 AM

LOL @Hon Glad! :D

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 08:19 AM

That chauffer, forever holding a pig's bottle. Captured on film. The way the world will remember him.

(the original) Mel
 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 08:27 AM

The nice lady is sharing her piggy with that nice man, oh, what? oh, never mind. Yes, very dignified, (the original Mel).

Lath and plaster bleeny snacks! Hmmm, sounds very tasty-can you share the recipe? Does it come in a wooden box for lunch, by any chance? Will it fit in a backpack? (harharhar)

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 08:37 AM

I bet that pig does a mean Charleston.

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 08:56 AM

Are you talking to me? Are you talking to me? They call me MISTER PIG!!!!! AAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 09:19 AM

@Katrina: Lath&plaster bleeny snax are an ol' family receipt complete with secret ingrejunts, ya know, the ones that I could tellya 'bout, but then I'd hafta do something nasty tewya, so we usually just leave'em out of the receipt and makeya guess.

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 09:21 AM

OMG I *so* want that lady's cloche hat.

But yeah, she should have been wearing one of the many plastic based faux fur or synthetic wool polar fleece winter coats that were widely available in the 20's (rolls eyes)...

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 09:22 AM

Is little piggy heading to the market?

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 10:32 AM

I should have been born in the 20s. The no-boobs-no-butt look was all the rage back then...

*oink oink snort*

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 10:35 AM

oh lord. nuffing about about a nearly 100 year old fur coat? there are actual current things to get upset about--just ask around if you need a few.

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 10:36 AM

Well, Fegh, I CAN nuff about what this woman has on her back.


 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 11:17 AM

OK, well, I guess the ONE thing imperfect about the picture is the real fur coat...

...but I still love the picture!!!

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 11:58 AM

I don't think he's wearing an eyepatch. I think that's just the shadow from the brim of his hat. Arrrrrgh, matey.

warrior rabbit
 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 12:47 PM

Let's try to not apply modern mindsets on people from almost a hundred years ago, mmmmkay? Otherwise we would all hate and dispise generations past. You can hate on the damned coat all you want, but try to grasp the whole historical perspective thing? As in, it's bloody pointless to whine about it now. Pointless and more than a little stupid.

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 02:24 PM

I think it's the cats pajamas!!!

And I love the chauffeur, he's all "Grumble, grumble..."

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 05:03 PM

I love pics from this period. Everything in the pics bring up mystery. The time of year. The fog. What that path looks like in Summer. The courteous tendant. The notoriety of the piglet. The immense mansion. The bodacious honker on that woman. All good.

 |  Aug 28, 2008 at 05:09 PM

Corona: I hadn't noticed her bodacious honker :} your right, and her plates (plates of meat=feet) are on the largish side.

Hon Glad
 |  Aug 29, 2008 at 12:17 AM

Mmmh, it´s the fur coat that bothers me too.... I´m sure they didn´t have fake fur coats back in 1925 so surely that must be real...


Barbarella von Fluffenstein
 |  Aug 29, 2008 at 02:43 AM

Erm, does anyone else thing that photo's slightly dogdy? It's awfully clear and crisp for something taken 90 years ago...

cat among the pidgeons
 |  Aug 29, 2008 at 04:09 AM

I'm kinda with you, cat among. Do those look like 1920's shoes? I dunno, not an expert. I am, however, a little taken with the price tag still on McPiggerson's leash. How gauche!

 |  Aug 29, 2008 at 05:45 AM

Well, for a start, not all old photographs are damaged. My family has several old photos from the late 19th and early 20th centuries that are in perfect condition. Those that do have damage on them get scanned and corrected/cleaned up.

As for the footwear, the shoes look quite period to me. Not all women then wore the fancy small heeled mary jane type shoes that one sees in fashion plates, that was hardly the only style of footwear. Just like not all women today wear 4 inch heels or Ugs or whatever other high fashion shoes one sees in fashion photos nowadays. The woman in the photo doesn't look like she's dressed up to go party, so why would she be wearing what are essentially the dancing shoes?

 |  Aug 29, 2008 at 06:58 AM

mberkie0- as this is Cute Overload, I won't be needing Nasty things, thanks. I'll just make up a batch of Old Mother Katrina's finest, um, biscuits,that's it, warm, fresh from the oven, so light and airy with butter dripping off them, and oh, look there are more over there, yes, by God, they have cheese in them with light herbs and oh, look, more butter dripping off them. No, no you don't have to eat the whole thing, dear, just let me get you a piece of fresh chocolate CAKE that I just frosted and decorated with YOUR NAME ON IT.
(Mess with me, huh? I'll make you talk! No-sir-eeeee-I'll get that recipe if it ki....wait a minute...) that was the point, wasn't it? (Flern), grumble, grumble, teeth nashing...

 |  Aug 29, 2008 at 07:06 AM

Vampy, I don't understand your logic. Should we not try to understand what led to oppression of women or slavery or other things in the past we'd rather not see repeated? Just because something is long over doesn't mean it should be forgotten or forgiven... or that it is pointless to think about it. We should try to learn from the past, no?

 |  Aug 30, 2008 at 10:43 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

« Choose a Snooze | Home | The Patagonia—WHUUUUUUUT? »




  • Receive the daily content of CuteOverload in your email box. Free!

    Your email address will only be used for this purpose and not given out to any other third party.

    Enter your Email

    Powered by FeedBlitz

Cute Caps!

  • Did you know you can add CuteCaps to your own webpage? Try it!

Got Cute?

  • Think you have a cute photo, Punk? [Clint Eastwood voice] If you think it fits our seriously stringent requirements, send it to us. We just might post it! But if we don't, it's really for the best [patting your back.]

Choosey bloggers choose:

  • TypePad!

    If TypePad helps your blog survive a Slashdotting, you know it's strong.

    Set Up Your Blog For Free with TypePad! If I can do it, you tewtelly can.

Email Me

  • press-related: press [at] cutelabs.com
  • business-related: meg [at] cutelabs.com
  • submissions: cuteoverload [at] frostdesign.net

Press Coverageses

  • Don't miss our Press page for ALL pattings on the back!


Powered by TypePad