« Orange eyes, tufted ears—wot a combo | Home | I'm newborn and I ken't git up »

Feb 02, 2007

Hedges 'n' Racks? Nah-ahn

Um, "Hedges 'n' Racks" is DEF a new category, People.

//Photos removed!//

The Peeps are always innovating, what can I say...

Email to a Friend | Add to del.icio.us |


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hedges 'n' Racks? Nah-ahn:

» Behold! from Isaac Schrödinger
The luckiest hedgehog in the world. [Read More]


I just don't think there'll be a lot of these.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 10:52 PM

hedgie is totally cute, the girl however does not appear old enough for you to be advertising her rack

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 10:53 PM

ha ha ha ha! ow :P

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 10:53 PM

Ehn! I thought the general concensus was that 'da peeps don't like the (fill in the blank) and racks photos. *sigh* I've never felt a hedgie but I'm assuming its bristly and coarse vs. soft, so...um...*hands Tirza a bottle of lotion and a sweater*

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 10:55 PM

*settles in with popcorn and beer to watch the debate begin!*

chet's momma
 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 10:56 PM

I agree wif Dee

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 10:56 PM

For once, I kinda think this pic is a little too far, too. She's seems really young, and at the bottom right of the second picture... seems a little indecent. ^^;

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 10:59 PM

I really don't mind *insert animal* 'n racks pictures, but can the girl at least wear a top that doesn't give her a split-boob? I'm sure it was accidental though.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:00 PM

I approve of this post 1000%. By which I mean "Yowza."

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:01 PM

umm, excuse me miss, but it seems as if your breasticle if popping out

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:03 PM

Tirza's the cutest thing on the whole page. But maybe a little bit on the young side, true.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:04 PM

Tirza's the cutest thing on the whole page. But maybe a little bit on the young side, true.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:05 PM

Um... are pictures like this necessary? Well, whatever. I don't really care, but I personally do not like coming to this site to see cute animals, and instead seeing a boob coming out of a top. I don't have a huge problem with it or anything, but I'd prefer not to see them. More cute animals and less racks please!

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:06 PM

Yikes. She definitely looks too young... and the boob floppage is completely uncalled for. Inappropriate...

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:09 PM

I dunno, it was kind of cute the first couple of times but now it's just starting to feel a little too gratuitous. Besides, why can't we see more guys cuddling kitties, etc? That's just as cute.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:09 PM

Will set some pudding up in the fridge, come back and look at the fighting tomorrow LOL. Oh no! A person's body :P

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:12 PM

Awww, how unfortunate! She spent all that money getting a hedgey and now she can't afford clothing!

Seriously though, the hedgehog is darling - but the girl looks like my 13 year-old cousin.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:15 PM

Wow Tirza is really pretty! But is it really indecent to see a bit of her epidermis? I say, if you don't like Megasilly's very individualistic blog, don't look.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:19 PM

Come on people don't be so prude. Getting freaked out by someone in swimsuit, tss...

I think the hedge's cute!

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:19 PM

Under-age under-boob :(

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:21 PM

"Ehn! I thought the general concensus was that 'da peeps don't like the (fill in the blank) and racks photos."

The consensus was it's Meg's blog and she will continue to post whatever she wants.

And hedgehog underbelly is soft, very moishe so.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:26 PM

I just think it looks a bit painful - aren't hedgehogs all prickly? (Oh noes, she's wearing a *bathing suit*! Peeps, this is the 21st century, not the 19th!)

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:27 PM

That girl is way too young. Cute Overload should be more responsible in their decisions of what pictures will be posted.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:29 PM

Y'all really think she looks underage? She looks like my friends and I when we were in college...and when we got out. And frankly? I didn't even notice her...wardrobe problems until people on here pointed it out, so maybe the problem is not Meg's, or Tirza's, but those of you who are staring at the photo looking not at the cute, but for something to be upset about.

(P.S. I wish I had the bod for that bathing suit)

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:35 PM

Awright, y'all boys gots Cats n Racks and now hedgies n' racks.

Us girlz wanna see ferrets n' shorts or sumpthin.

Just sayin'


 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:35 PM

Are fan signs not too far behind...?! ;)

And to say something about the seeming lack of 'guys & _____' images, there really are few placed to place an animal thatd have the same effect. ARMADILLOS & ARMPITS :(.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:36 PM

Popcorn, check.
Pudding, check.
We're set.
Oh, Chet, beer too.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:36 PM

Ah, I love it when the prudes freak out.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:40 PM

Okay, so I'm thinkin as long as it's advertising the animals (yes even pic #2) and not a person (underage or not - pic #1) it's all good.

But...seriously, what if I had a hamster near my speedo line, with a bit of my bits popping out. It would definitely be banned forever.

Just saying.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:41 PM

I love lounging around in my bikini on the leather chair.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:44 PM

Ok....but animals in cleavage is not hot....slut

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:44 PM

Both the hedgepiggie and the girl are very cute, which is why I really like the first pic. The second pic is ruined only because of that teeny wardrobe malfunction. (Plus, IMO, the composition and colours of the bikini etc completely overshadow lil' hedgie-poo.)

I really like pets n racks, but I have to admit the pics look a bit gratituous sometimes.


Peeps, Do Not Upstage Your Pets!!!

*goes off kitten-huffing*

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:47 PM

I really don't intend to get drawn into a flame war here, but Christ, calling her a slut makes you more unattractive than any picture that has been posted on cute overload.

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:49 PM

Does it really matter how old she is? The picture is not meant to arouse you. It's about a cute hedgie getting a snuggle. There are plenty of places on the internet where you can see girls in swimwear; many of them have a disclaimer on the front that says all artists are 18. So go to one of those sites and relax, safe in your neuroses.
This is not one of those sites, and never will be.

With regards to the comment about being responsible: should we also enforce blacked out windows in schools in case people drive past looking? I don’t need Cuteoverload to be my moral compass. Nor do I need a person’s date of birth to determine if I think they are attractive.
But I do need cuteoverload for my fix of cute bunnehs.
More bunnehs please!

 |  Feb 02, 2007 at 11:51 PM

I agree that Tirza is a very attractive girl, but I came her to see cute animals, not attractive girls coming out of their swimming suits (although I'm sure it was unintentional). And I am also getting sick of the "(animal name)s & racks" category. Perhaps if the lower right-hand corner of the picture were edited just a bit, there would be no issue at all. Maybe Meg should review the pictures a bit closer before posting them...

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:00 AM

Cheers to Claire: yes it is Meg's blog after all and she can post whatever she wants. I'm just very glad she shares it with all of us. Keep the pics coming, Meg, be they cute stuff n racks, cute stuff n earlobes or what have you. I, for one, love it all.

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:01 AM

Meg, in general I love your site and think your have good taste about this stuff. But this looks like a young teenager who's staged a picture trying to get sexual attention... (I might have done the same thing when I was 14, put on makeup and my bikini and tried to get older guys interested. But adults would have rolled their eyes and tried to stop me doing it, right?)

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:03 AM

I know how you guys feel. Every day, it's so hard to get out of bed, knowing that every second person I see... there will be BOOBS. It gets harder and harder to avert my eyes, lest I know the horror of seeing them.

Those horrible, horrible women! Can't they hide them? Walk backward? Have SOME courtesy for us poor folk who cannot bear the sight of them?

My OWN MOTHER betrays me.

And... oh my GOD. I HAVE THEM TOO. Oh sweet baby Jesus what will I DO?

My life is overrrr. The boobs win!

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:05 AM

Ok, can I just say that IMO that is one ugly bikini.
Thanks for listening.

Martha in Washington
 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:06 AM

So, are you people scared of going to the beach too? Nobody under 18 is allowed to wear a bikini, true fact! Only, you know, not. She looks like my sister too. Said sister is 19. So, whatever.

More racks, wee.

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:14 AM

-Hedger: cute
-Girl: kinda cute (won't say she's to young... at almost 30, fellow teachers still confuse me with students...)
-Bikini: not vry cute
-Boobie sticking out: NOT. CUTE.
-Reading the coments about the boobie and the (supposedly young) gal: priceless!

Just Me
 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:17 AM

Oh good lord, god forbid we see some skin. XD People get freaked out over the strangest things...

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:24 AM

nibblin' on choc-lit watching the show!

the only beef i have is i keep sending photos of my kittehs, and they are still not up on CO, *sigh*

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:26 AM

The girl seriously looks like she's twelve to me. I was pretty disturbed to see this, and I recall a few other questionable ages in the ___n'racks categories. I'm not even a prude, and don't care about seeing a little boob popping out. I just don't want it to be a twelve-year-old's.

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:38 AM

She's probably old enough, and the peek-a-boobage isn't that big a deal. But if it becomes more about the boobs and less about the critter, then something's up, peeps.

Focus on the cute hedgie! Not so much the girl and her boobs...

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:42 AM

Awww, sweeeet, to the 1st pic. 2nd one isn't bad, I just like the first one better. The suit slippage is unfortunate.

Generally I don't mind ___'s n' racks. [Racks are awesome, in general, right?] I do mind the pics when they're really gratuitously set up, but this one doesn't trigger that button for me. What gets me is that comments saying "everyone who doesn't like them is a prude! Go away!" seem so... uncute.

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:47 AM

i doubt this girl is as young as you're all thinking. i just think that the animals in racks theme isn't cute at all, and i come here to see cute! animals in racks is esentially pretty boring animal photos.

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 12:54 AM

First of all, its the owner's site. She can post whatever she so chooses to post. If you don't like it, don't look at it! It is not her responsibility to bend over backwards to please you. Secondly, this is not the Victorian Era. Those are boobs. Women have them. Men have them. (some men have moobs and go topless, anatomically theres no major difference *shudder* )Get over it. Yeah theres a little boobage popping out at the bottom, but ladies, honestly, can you tell me you've NEVER had a little side or bottom cleavage showing in a bathing suit? I can't.

It has not crossed the line of innapropriatness or public decency laws. If it offends your values, I hope you stay clear of a public beach. Focus on the cute little critter going "OOOH SHINY!!!" over the bathing suit ring (he is sooooo checking that out), and don't look at it if you don't like it.

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 01:21 AM

You know what really gets me about when these photos get posted? The commentroversy always breaks out...

And Meg posts more. Because she likes them. Her track history says there will always been pets 'n' racks pictures on CuteOverload. So...I'm not going to tell you to get out, but complaining is completely an absolutely pointless.

This picture reminds me of my own experience with a hedgie though. I wasn't wearing a bikini, but a baggy shirt that the hedgie fell in love with, and decided to chew upon to annoint himself. It took three people to detatch said hedgie. I love hedgies <3

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 01:24 AM

That looks potentially painful. Still, it's cute how the hedgie's contemplating going through the ring in the second pic.

I don't think Tirza is a kid, either. She seems like a petite woman, which is why she appears maybe a bit childlike on first glance.

Aaaaand... eh... y'know... I guess it's cute and all... and Lord knows how much I love pretty girls in bikini tops... but maybe this isn't quite the right stuff to have on C.O. :\ Still, cute hedgie! And cute girl.

 |  Feb 03, 2007 at 01:24 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

« Orange eyes, tufted ears—wot a combo | Home | I'm newborn and I ken't git up »




  • Receive the daily content of CuteOverload in your email box. Free!

    Your email address will only be used for this purpose and not given out to any other third party.

    Enter your Email

    Powered by FeedBlitz

Cute Caps!

  • Did you know you can add CuteCaps to your own webpage? Try it!

Got Cute?

  • Think you have a cute photo, Punk? [Clint Eastwood voice] If you think it fits our seriously stringent requirements, send it to us. We just might post it! But if we don't, it's really for the best [patting your back.]

Choosey bloggers choose:

  • TypePad!

    If TypePad helps your blog survive a Slashdotting, you know it's strong.

    Set Up Your Blog For Free with TypePad! If I can do it, you tewtelly can.

Email Me

  • press-related: press [at] cutelabs.com
  • business-related: meg [at] cutelabs.com
  • submissions: cuteoverload [at] frostdesign.net

Press Coverageses

  • Don't miss our Press page for ALL pattings on the back!


Powered by TypePad