« Blonde Brew | Home | Now that's what I call a Crum-pet!* »

Feb 03, 2006

Cats 'n' Racks—it's official

Ow! A third submission for a new "Cats n' Racks" category arrived. It's now an offical category! As 'Tracy B' noted, "It doesn't get any rackier than this. :)" ha!

Tracy_b

Email to a Friend | Add to del.icio.us |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b09f69e200d83432b42453ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cats 'n' Racks—it's official:

Comments

When do we get the Cock & Balls series?

Me
 |  Feb 03, 2006 at 08:21 PM

Isn't Life Grand!

Kevin
 |  Feb 03, 2006 at 08:32 PM

holy crap, that is a lucky cat

luverboy
 |  Feb 03, 2006 at 08:34 PM

Excellent way to keep ones' boobage warm in winter. :P

Rachel
 |  Feb 03, 2006 at 08:57 PM

Wawwwwwww.... kitters is all asleepy in Heaven™.

Theo
 |  Feb 03, 2006 at 08:58 PM

I don't want to think about what those claws could be doing in there... ow!

Tina
 |  Feb 03, 2006 at 10:56 PM

Yeah, but how much of that is rack and how much is just cat?

Hmmm????

And she'd better not sneeze and startle the cat, or there'll be even less rack...

AuntieMame
 |  Feb 03, 2006 at 11:39 PM

great rack... nice cat... gabulous category!

eli
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 12:26 AM

fabulous

eli
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 12:27 AM

What I would give to be that little kitty!

anon
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 02:32 AM

boobs!

name
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 02:42 AM

*sigh* my hell. they're boobs. get over it.

Jessica
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 04:01 AM

:( boring. what's happening to the standards eh??!

kaori
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 04:44 AM

For all we know, the owner of the otherwise-nice rack has the kitty's claws secured in a location where they won't do much damage if the kitty gets startled...

Mr Fluffy
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 05:51 AM

When I got my first two gerbils the boys also found somewhere warm and quiet to hide
http://members.aol.com/mermum/vodnbailszsm.jpg

gill
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 06:43 AM

wow that girl looks uncomfderble or how ever you spell it

andrea
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 07:30 AM

Did this site get hijacked by an adolescent boy?

otter
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 08:04 AM

I'm right there with the first post "When do we get the Cock & Balls series?" Yeah!! Right on!

And after that I want to see a Rectums and Dogs category... followed closely by Butts and Bunnies.

After that, maybe you could go a step farther and show people using gerbils in a sex kink thing, eh?

Change the page format though from "childlike innocent" to something alittle more fitting... like www.alldumb.com uses. The sweet pastels and baby chick format is joltingly out of synch.

Amorena
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 08:09 AM

the above post was heavy sarcasm, by the way (in cae that wasn't glaringly obvious).

Amorena
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 08:10 AM

Well, I'm not going to be visiting this site with my 6-year old daughter anymore.
She's a bright, curious little girl and I don't feel like breaking her in on the bad news, yet.
"Daddy, what are racks?"
"Well honey, there are people who, in their own minds, detach girls' body parts from the people they are, and then name them wierd things. 'Rack' is what some not so nice people call a grown up girl's breasts".

Nah... I think I'll wait until she's a little older before exposing her to that.

If anyone knows kid safe sites with cute animal pictures, please email me. I know of one or two with some photos, but they're not consistently posted.

benjamin01
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 08:16 AM

This is not so cute.
First of all, the woman's shirt is very unflattering to her body.
Besides that, why would I want to look at a cat in some woman's tits?
It's not even an especially adorable cat, it's just a cat. I can't even see its face or body.
So mainly I'm left to staring at some unflattering picture of someone's tits.
This is not cute. NOT CUTE AT ALL!

Liz
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 08:20 AM

B-O-R-I-N-G category.

That photo isn't cute...'cept maybe to the 13 year old male mentality. ("yuk yuk boobies whee!")

Caroline
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 08:24 AM

Fffssst *pops a budweiser*

"Yep Cletus, this har cateegory may not fit in with them 'rules of cuteness', but them there titties sure am good to look at. Whooeeee" *b-u-r-p*

(site removed from "Bookmarks")

playful_shelties
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 08:29 AM

I'd like to make a note that even if it was a flattering picture of the woman it wouldn't make it any better.

Liz
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 08:38 AM

I agree with you Liz.

... and it'll be interesting to see if the same haters who flamed Joanne and Mandy for calling out the mind-numbing UN-cuteness of posting the donkey photo will jump on your comment...

otter
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 08:40 AM

Get over yourselves, please.

Penguinx
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 09:00 AM

I love cats and boobs and Cute Overload. Bring it on!

Steph
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 09:22 AM

cats and racks is hot! more please

mr.dan
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 10:10 AM

I have to admit, this photo is kinda boring (or Uncreative might be a better word) but I don't really think the picture is as unsettling as several of you are making it out to be. The title of the category sucks, though. At any rate, I wonder if the website folks are reacting to all the passive aggressive remarks.

I'm not going to stop visiting this website over one dumb submitted photo, it's just not worth it.


;)

Lauren
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 10:39 AM

John Hurt is looking HOTT yo

Doubleclick
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 10:59 AM

Excellent category. If the prudes want to leave, let 'em. And this is also a category that appeals to men of all ages, not just 13-year old boys.

Anonymouser
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 11:24 AM

This site has quietly been making my head 'splode for months now and this is my first comment.

I, for one, love this site. Though I suppose it takes a lil more than the occaisional use of the word "bitches" in jest to offend me. What's more I'm not particularly offended by fully-clothed naughty bits juxtaposed wif cute lil animals. Maybe I'm just sick and jaded. Scratch that - I AM sick and jaded. Which is why I need this site! It keeps me regular. Obviously it's too late for some of us.

That being said, if anyone wants links to humorless-dried-up-old-prude-safe animal sites, please email me at sux2BU@yahoo.com.

Thanks and keep up the fine and not-really-offensive-at-all-if-you-ax-me work, Meg.

PS - Isn't a little kid asking "daddy, what's a rack" just adorable? When they ask this you can answer "it's a country the US unilaterally invaded in 2003" - thus preserving their innocence. C'mon!

Curmudgeon
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 11:25 AM

What a ridiculous uproar. Cats like confined spaces. Cats like warm places. Cats like being with their humans, no matter what body part is involved. The cat probably went there all by itself.

If you're using the internet to amuse your children, shame on you. If your child is on the internet without supervision, shame on you. Yes, fine, have a few sites you can go to with your kids, but you should always check it first, every single time. And besides, there are plenty of children-only sites around, don't rag on this one for not being one of them.

Lastly - get a sense of humour, please.

arbed
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 12:03 PM

really there are plenty of porn sites on the internet. if someone wants to look at tits, they can go elsewhere. please keep this a cute and fun family website.

Jessica
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 12:36 PM

i think kittens in shirts are cute. because they're curious. its not porn, because you cant SEE her boobs, so i dont see what the big deal is!

some people seriously over react.

Jennifer
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 12:52 PM

Nice rack! And the kitten is cute too.

Mel
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 01:11 PM

Zzzzzzzzz.... Nothing in this photo is cute, and the photo quality is crap. WTF?

- A rule of cuteness you seem to have overlooked is innocence, also the reason I *used to* love this site more than anything; good hearted, innocent F-U-N. Kick this new category to the curb and give us what we ALL came here for!!! it reeks of what I'd expect to find in FHM or Stuff where standards are low.

**Anyone want to suggest an alternative w/o cats n' racks category? **

.a
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 02:43 PM

It's funny that everyone is freaking out about a picture of a fully clothed woman, with a cute cat popping out. That is cute. People just need to phukin chill out and to whoever said they're not coming here anyomore with their 6 year old daughter, shame on you for thinking you can shelter your child through the internet. I clicked on a name of someone who posted in this thread and in 2 more clicks found a picture of 2 girls doing things together that would really freak your kid out. It's the internet baby, I know damn well I wouldn't let my 6 year old roamin around on it.

funny
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 03:03 PM

Wow, SOMEBODY sure has some major mental/emotional issues over the word rack. Maybe you need to see a shrink before you pass your insecurities and paranoia on to your kids.

Nobody
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 03:12 PM

FOR SERIOS!

I mean, give 'em a break! It's just the human body, and its cute animal placed together. some may see this as HEINOUSLY sexual and get all uppity about it where others such as myself see it as something playful and fun and NOTHING MORE. Let me put it this way: if a playful rendition of placing cute animals in places where you normally don't see cute animals offends you, then you obviously have some issues to work out, automagically thinking such things as being pornographic. Shame on you for not knowing when to simply redirect your browser when you are offended by something. Meg puts a lot of time and money offering the masses this grand service, and if you don't like it, well just point your browser at www.stickupmyanus.com and you'll be happy not looking at such HORRIBLY PROFANE IMAGES. C'mon, gimme a break. www.whitehouse.com is a worse offender on the Internet than cuteoverload.com. Go put your energies and opinions to something that does worse than this awesome site. You people really piss me off with your misdirected taking of offense. I Meg and her site!

hashi
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 03:21 PM

SHE STUFFS! SHE STUFFS!

I think we should actually expand the category to "cute animals down shirts" - chihuahuas, ferrets, kittens, the gamut! Ladies' shirts, mens' shirts, maybe even shirts worn by OTHER CUTE ANIMALS!

terebi
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 03:33 PM

This doesn't bother me in the least. I don't think of it in terms of "cute" necessarily ("tit"illating, though ;-), but I love visiting this site, I'm not "de-linking" you, and you can put whatever the heck you want up here. If it's cute to you, Meg, then post it. Your site, your call. If people don't like it, they can go elsewhere. Keep up the great work! (LOVE the "blonde brew" puppy pic by the way, for obvious reasons. ;-D

Mo
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 04:45 PM

I agree with terebi. The only problem with the new "Cats n' Racks" category is that it should be open to cute fluffy creatures in general. I nominate, "Critters n' Cleavage."

Also, I think the problem with the above photo is not that it's offensive or overly sexual so much as that it's just not very opportune photography. It would be cuter if we could see the kitty's face, or if the photographer took a more interesting camera angle.

But for all the haters up there? Please calm down. Abandon the site if you must; they seem to have more than enough visitors to keep their server busy, but do not expect to make the Internet a safe and innocent place for your children. It's an ugly world out there in cyberspace. This is practically angelic.

Alyson
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 04:52 PM

Yeah, well, Curmudgeon, you may be sick and jadeed but that's not what this site yused to appeal to.

"arbed" your statement "If you're using the internet to amuse your children, shame on you." wins the dimwit award. The Internet is one very legitimate resource for parents and teachers. Yoo do have to scan and filter and this site uused to be relaibly fine -- not anymore.
I'd email you to chat further about it but you gave your email address as insertemailaddress@here.com. Is that all that's phony about you?

to the person posting as "funny": logic is not your forte, eh? "and to whoever said they're not coming here anyomore with their 6 year old daughter, shame on you for thinking you can shelter your child through the internet"
No, Einstein, I do not think I can "shleter my child through the Internet" -- but I can filter sites ands direct her toward ones without tasteless content, which this one used to be.
you gave your email address as smackmytits@withyourdick.com. Apparently you love to spread the skank around.

The person who posted as "Nobody" gave an email address of kaskjdhjah@khkjhkjh.askdhsakjdh. And he/she/it says someone else has mental/emotional issues?? What a hoot.

"Rack" started as an inside joke among redneck deer hunters "whoa look at the rack on that one hehehehe" and caught on with frat boys, etc.
Way to go Cute Overload.

benjamin01
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 04:56 PM

cats-n-racks, its catchy.and cute. get over it...

fastdrivinwoman
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 05:00 PM

The people who dismiss parents' concerns with teh glib "The Internet isn't safe" fail to get the point that kids ARE on teh INternet adn have a right to its resources,too.
Careful parents do select safe sites. This site was considered kid friendly... I mean Come on. "Cute Overload" -- can't get much fuzzier and kidlike than that.


So now it's Cute Overload and Tits". Great. It's liek having had a place with soft, sweet baby animals and healthy environment amd somebody starts stashing a Jack-off magazine among the kittens.
Believe me, word will get out and kids won't be coming here.


Aside from the kids, I don't know many women who with self respect who enjoy having their breasts referred to as a "rack".

Guess that getting on CNN went to "Meg's" head, and she/he is trying to appeal to the "adult" crowd now.
We've got bets that the site admin is actually a male between 18 and 25 who was posing as a girl, "Meg" because he's embarassed to admit he's a boy who likes cute fuzzy little animals enough to host a site.

Susan Simmons
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 05:10 PM

I wish the photo of the cat were good. It's just the back of it's head and part of it's profile and the photo is definitely not cute. It's like someone stuck this photo in here just to be able to say "rack". Grow up, man.

vanya_k
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 05:13 PM

While I think this picture is cute, I don't really think an entire category dedicated to cats n racks is totally necessary - you can hardly have too much originality between pictures; how many variations between cats and racks can you get? I thought the pictures were fine just sitting in the 'Cats' category as it was.

Marshmallow
 |  Feb 04, 2006 at 05:40 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

« Blonde Brew | Home | Now that's what I call a Crum-pet!* »

Sizzearch

  •  
    Web
    cuteoverload.com

CuteMail

  • Receive the daily content of CuteOverload in your email box. Free!

    Your email address will only be used for this purpose and not given out to any other third party.

    Enter your Email


    Powered by FeedBlitz

Cute Caps!

  • Did you know you can add CuteCaps to your own webpage? Try it!

Got Cute?

  • Think you have a cute photo, Punk? [Clint Eastwood voice] If you think it fits our seriously stringent requirements, send it to us. We just might post it! But if we don't, it's really for the best [patting your back.]

Choosey bloggers choose:

  • TypePad!

    If TypePad helps your blog survive a Slashdotting, you know it's strong.

    Set Up Your Blog For Free with TypePad! If I can do it, you tewtelly can.

Email Me

  • press-related: press [at] cutelabs.com
  • business-related: meg [at] cutelabs.com
  • submissions: cuteoverload [at] frostdesign.net

Press Coverageses

  • Don't miss our Press page for ALL pattings on the back!

Sitemeter

Powered by TypePad