Cute Overload! :)

Sep 25, 2008

People (muzzle) powsches!!

These prosh humans have muzzelpowsches of their very own.

They are extremely creative. You can make one too!

Eliza F., I'll do an Xtreme C.O. Close up on you if you don't watch out.

Posted by Meg on September 25, 2008 in Primates | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b09f69e2010534cc121c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference People (muzzle) powsches!! :

Comments

less people. more cute.: Amanda; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:11 AM

Not a bleening animal to be seen!: kk3; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:11 AM

With this simple trick we could make a cut price version of 'Planet of the Apes' with out all those Rick Baker prosthetics.: Hon Glad; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:18 AM

Terrible what are these women? THEY ARE NOT FLUFFY NOR ATTRACTIVE.: SOFI; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:22 AM

Is it just me or does the one in the blue kind of remind you of a hammy?? lol: In Awwwe; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:26 AM

The one on the right look like she has a fluffy scarf on. That counts for something, yes?: Sarah F.; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:27 AM

Meg, you just wanna keep the nuffs happy. First a baby, now grownup hoomans. *goes back to supermarket to buy several gallons of milk for all the puddin' that's gonna be necessary* *opts for the store brand instant. not to good for eatin', but nice and sticky for throwin'*: metsakins; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:43 AM

That *too* good. *blushes*: metsakins; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:43 AM

NOT CUTE! NOT CUTE! NOT CUTE!: Ani; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:49 AM

I apologize if this has been brought up before, but am I the only one who objects to humans being filed as "primates?": thequeenmum; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:53 AM

let's have more cute animals and less uncute people.: btf; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:54 AM

No, I object to that as well. It's 7:55 am here, and there are people already opposing to a few muzzlepouches on CO? What is this world coming to. It's funny, we've all made that face. So?: CoffeeCup; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:57 AM

Note: I object to being filed under primates, not to the photo. The photo is funny. No opposition from me - I like people. Many of you should try it sometime.: CoffeeCup; | Sep 25, 2008 at 04:57 AM

I don't mind the babies snuggling puppies, or babies kissing pigs, but this is not cute. Not something I like to wake up to.: ashley; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:01 AM

What is this ...? --No cute animals...where am I??? I AM LOST ON TEH INTERWEBS!!! OH TEH NOESSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11: Pliny; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:07 AM

Ah, I should mention that as well! No objection to the picture, just the classification. I love CO.. not trying to start stuff or anything. Thanks CoffeeCup, glad I'm not alone here. :): thequeenmum; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:07 AM

Feel free to post plenty more pictures of the girl in the middle! :D: Jon; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:08 AM

Humans are primates: It's just basic taxonomic terminology.: Jim N.; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:17 AM

Ashley says: " Not something I like to wake up to." Jim N. says: "I beg to differ.": Jim N.; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:19 AM

Jim N. speaks the truth. If not under primates, how else would you have pictures of hoomans classified?: cheesybird; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:24 AM

Blegh: Annica; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:26 AM

So what's wrong with being filed under primate? I'm not trying to be facetious here...seriously, why are people disturbed by this? It simply appears to be a humourous take on our humble origins.: The Koala; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:26 AM

DO NOT WANT!: Silly Mama; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:26 AM

I may be in the minority here, but I don't have a dislike for hoomans at all. Babies can be adorable, and the three girls in the picture are cute. True, I'd rather see hunks with fuzzy kittehs and puppers, but that's just me, I guess...: MadameX; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:34 AM

Wow, peeples. Since I'm not yet through my first cup of coffee, I can't tell if y'all are joking or just mean. YAY MUZZLEPOWCHES OF ALL VARIETAYS! We must be equal opportunity cute lovers, peeples! Spread da WUV!: Capt' Tightpants; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:35 AM

whenever you put people on everyone comments that they hate it...TAKE A HINT!!! [A fine and lovely day to you too, dear. Are the carbuncles healing? - Ed.]: mg; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:35 AM

PS: Little lady on the right in the blue looks like she was caught unawares - like a puppy gnawing on a shoe just got caught in the act and is simultaneously surprised yet not about to stop gnawing. HA!: Capt' Tightpants; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:36 AM

You object to being classified as a primate? I hope you'll send an angry letter to Merriam-Webster: 3 [New Latin Primates, from Latin, plural of primat-, primas] : any of an order (Primates) of mammals that are characterized especially by advanced development of binocular vision, specialization of the appendages for grasping, and enlargement of the cerebral hemispheres and that include humans, apes, monkeys, and related forms (as lemurs and tarsiers): Martha K; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:37 AM

Capt. Tightpants, are you perchance the same Captain Tightpants of the BSG forum?: MadameX; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:39 AM

Relevant and filed appropriately, I say.: Karo; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:40 AM

blah.....: katiedid; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:40 AM

I have a doppleganger on the BSG Forum? There's a BSG Forum? Sorry, MadameX, I know not of what you speak. I am not they, they are not me. Also - do we sound alike? My curiosity is piqued!!: Capt' Tightpants; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:41 AM

Capt. Tightpants, apparently you do. Yes, there is. And yes, you do. It's been a while since I lurked there (Skiffy turned too toxic for my tastes); I went by Eaglestar51...: MadameX; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:46 AM

.....: chanpon; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:46 AM

Well, Martha K, how can we be classified as primates if we never evolved from them? God just put his wittle finger on the dirt and POOF humans sprang up. I guess that makes us closer to legumes! I say we re-classify humans as legumes!: Balamuthia; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:47 AM

Nice try, ladies! Hmm, I wonder if this one will be filed under "pa-sickies" soon?: starling; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:48 AM

The picture is not cute, but it is funny - so it is o.k. People who object to being linked with primates (although we do share alot of the same genome): way, way too hypo - pudding - emic. ps Meg/Theo : if you add a small photo of a kitten or puppy in some small corner of the picture you could satisfy at least some of the nuffs: browngrl; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:50 AM

Aww... they're so cute at that age!: Willow's Pillow; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:50 AM

Madame - BSG is a realm I have yet to enter, so I really have no idea. Which is surprising, because I'm usually all over the scifi. And I just chose this name because I needed a name not mine and every time I see it here I think of the Tightpants and it makes me smile. heh heh. I also don't usually post in most forums: I lurk here pretty much every day, but rarely have the urge to post. I usually just laugh my tushie off at the hilarious commentary. And I just saw NTMTOM's Gangster Bunnies, and nearly snorted my coffee. Now off to teach class. Oy. Let not the nuffs conquer!!: Capt' Tightpants; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:51 AM

Jim N, it's the taxonomy that I have a problem with. Clearly I disagree with evolution.: thequeenmum; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:52 AM

No prob with primates. I would probably object to a classification of "unusual animals". And no, mg, IF THAT IS YOUR REAL NAME, not "everyone" hates the human-subject posts - just people who never comment except to say they hate people.: Babs; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:53 AM

Wouldn't "Cap'n Tightpants" be more appropriate in a Firefly forum? They still have those, right?: Theo; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:53 AM

Babs -- "if that is your real name" ?? My real name is Theo, actually, but that's pretty rare on the internet.: Theo; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:55 AM

Now I know this is someones blog and its right to say that we have no place dictating what should or should not feature here. Demanding pics to be removed is just plain rude. If we don't like it we should surf elsewhere.....but the audience here comes to expect a certain content which is why we keep coming back for more. I think it would be a nice gesture if the management made some kind of announcment or acknowledgement that the content is changing. Not an appology or excuse, just 'hey dudes the sites evolving for different tastes". CO is currently my homepage at home and work and I check it at least 3 times a day, love the QT! But this post and the puppy nomming are totally out of character and not what I would choose to view. ICHC site have split their content between sister sites for different types of pics so its not like this is a new concept!?!?!: Zaferina; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:55 AM

Hm, seems to me from the comments that the guys don't mind the posting of cute women so much. Perhaps, Meg, if you posted an image of hunky man 'tocks, you could appease the nuffing gals as well.: Vicki; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:56 AM

Kinda funny but can we photoshop some hammies on top of their heads?? :-D: BarbaraL; | Sep 25, 2008 at 05:57 AM

Zaferina -- you make a very good point, but... how to put this?... ICHC might not be the best example to use as a comparison, here. Vicki -- when Meg *has* posted pix with dudes, 'tocks or not, the CO crowd has indeed gone wild. It's maybe a little frightening. (and you know, come to think of it, I believe I'm detecting something in this thread that smells just faintly like a double standard): Theo; | Sep 25, 2008 at 06:01 AM

"Jim N, it's the taxonomy that I have a problem with. Clearly I disagree with evolution. -- thequeenmum" ... Well, then... ... I have nothing. Debate is out, scorn is counterproductive. Look! Elephant tocks!: Willow's Pillow; | Sep 25, 2008 at 06:02 AM

Peeps, give it a break. It's funny and cute. But then again, all your grousing is kinda cute, too.: LibrarianJessica; | Sep 25, 2008 at 06:07 AM

A joke, Theo. Them's still allowed, neh? Zaferina, thanks for being grown-up about it, but really, no, it's not "totally out of character". Sure, the blog is *mostly* cute aminals, but Meg likes to throw a curve ball occasionally. It's all part of the delightful melange that is CO soup. Er sumthin.: Babs; | Sep 25, 2008 at 06:07 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Sep 25, 2008

People (muzzle) powsches!!

TrackBack

Comments

Sizzearch

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Recent Comments

Find-a-Pet!

Google Links

More! More! More!

CuteMail

CuteTracker

Cute Caps!

Got Cute?

Choosey bloggers choose:

Email Me

Press Coverageses

Sitemeter