« "Like, totally Bok!" | Home | Rule #16—Shoot. Nevermind. »

Feb 08, 2006

Roo 'n' Rack

Yes, I said it. So sue me. I'd like to see a class action against Cute Overload. The judge would throw it out on principle. Oh, and It's a male "rack" this time. I hope you're HAPPY!

[I am—just LOOK at those 'Roo lips!]


HUGE props to E. Collison, Special Forces, CO Army and Animal Pictures Archive.com.

Email to a Friend | Add to del.icio.us |


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Roo 'n' Rack:

» Wie niedlich from Christians wirre Gedanken
Es gibt ja reichlich Seiten im Internet. Aber für die folgende Seite muss man schon ziemlich hart sein, um nicht sofort ins Schluchzen zu kommen. Auf Cute Overload! werden Tierbilder gezeigt, die kaum niedlicher und süßer sein könnten. Wer könnte schon de [Read More]


Dude, is it possible to be BOTH "juicy" AND "beady"!?

 |  Feb 07, 2006 at 10:47 PM

Yowza (blushing) and a thousand thanks... I cannot tell a lie - I saw this in a baby animal photo pool and absolutely *had* to send it in.

Cheers to one and all!

E. Collison
 |  Feb 07, 2006 at 10:48 PM

LOL! that Roo is so smiling!

little sister
 |  Feb 07, 2006 at 11:26 PM

High BEF, but don't the flowing eyelashes cancel that out?
How adorable!

 |  Feb 07, 2006 at 11:42 PM


Lick My Pickles
 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 12:27 AM

I am a fan of Beady Eyes, myself. I don't see what is so bad about them. :)

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 12:47 AM

I'm disgusted by your pun. It should have been "rack and 'roo in".

I'll get my coat.

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 01:28 AM

Well, I still think that introducing human clumsiness into the beastful cuteness is a bad idea. Also, should you proceed in this vein, you may prefer to select a rack w/o acne on it.


 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 02:55 AM

It's not acne - it's a marsupial allergy.

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 03:00 AM

What a sweet Roo! He looks so kissable... and that's not a case of BEF - those eyes are big and dreamy...

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 03:06 AM

are those his eyelashes? He couldn't be any cuter, it should be declared illegal to be so cute!

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 03:11 AM

is it soft & warm, as well as beady-eyed and long-lashed? does it have little tickly-claws? such wee whiskered confection! O! *falls over.*

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 04:23 AM

Aww, these brauds need to stop sticking animals down their tops though. I'm not sure if they want us to stare at that or their breasts...otherwise, it's sooo cute. Poor thing.

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 04:30 AM

are we sure it's a roo joey? could be a pademelon, wallaby, or any other smaller macropus type thing. i love to say macropus. (it's a real word, so feel free to say it around your child who is surfing net instead of playing outside).

i also think the dots are from a man with a shorn chest. no hair, dots? the boy be smoove.

ah, meg, i love this site. thanks!

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 04:33 AM

what I'd give for those lashes....

mama roos are sooo lucky.. they get to squish cuteness all the time!

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 04:43 AM

i don't know what to say about this - it's just so adorable! where the heck did that guy get this little roo anyway? lucky!

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 05:15 AM

LOL to everyone - a male rack.

clearly this is the site for people with a sense of humour.

keep it up meg - everything you touch turns to cuteness gold.

johnny dollar
 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 05:27 AM

Big thumbs up to ya Meg - for everything!

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 05:37 AM

It's funny how so many people got all jumpy with a female 'rack', but is fine with male 'racks'. XD
And that is SUCH a beautiful Joey! Must be a girl =D

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 05:44 AM

i move for more male racks, pimply or no.

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 05:52 AM

It isn't acne, it appears to be tiny joey claw marks. This cat doesn't haave a thick coat of fur like the real mother would have, so when thone ANERABLE little macropus claws go grabbing about, it is going to leave marks on our pink-monkey flesh.

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 06:00 AM

Way too cute - I want a roo too!

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 06:13 AM

Methinks Meg is a bit confused.

Males don't have "racks", hun. :-)

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 06:22 AM

ROTFLMAO!! Take and anatomy class, Meg, sweetie. Males have nipples but not a "rack"... at least not the males I know don't have boobs.

Looks like Meg is into stirring up controversy. Guess just having a good site got b-o-r-i-n-g. LOL!

Folks who like this will love love love http://www.alldumb.com
Check it out!

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 06:32 AM


Meg is into being sarcsatic and offensive. Love it! What a gal/guy!

There's hope for a "camel toes and puppy paws" and "bunnies 'n butts" section yet! Right on!! *slurp*

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 06:37 AM

Thank you for continuing your faboo site in the face of criticism. Regarding men and racks: men can get breast cancer, therefore, they have breasts; therefore, we can call 'em "racks."

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 07:25 AM

what part of "if you don't like this site don't come here" do people not understand?

johnny dollar
 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 07:25 AM

How about Racks & Yaks?

(per link... I have to think that one of those alternate names for "yak" is a phonetic spelling of a word in one of the asiatic languages. You'll know it when you see it.)

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 07:43 AM

Oh, I disagree. There certainly are men out there with boobs. Manssiere, anyone? Or did you prefer The Bro?

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 08:24 AM

I can't believe you even noticed said "rack" when there's such a cute little fella hanging out in there!

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 08:31 AM

katie u'd believe it if you u knew how many billyuns of times i've looked at this pic.

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 09:12 AM

love it - lol - you go girl

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 09:17 AM

meatloaf's pendulous bosom in fightclub ends this conversation. men have racks, eventually....you'll see

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 12:03 PM

Cutest. Roo. EVAH!

How little is he?? You think of kangas as so big (and indeed grown ones are) but compare the size of this little guy's eye to the buttonhole right next to it! He's TEENY! And I WANT ONE! (That is, until it gets really big and can hop up and smack me in the butt with powerful feet and push me into a lake. Then it can go live on a Happy Kangaroo Ranch. Some restrictions apply. Offer not valid in Nebraska.)

Tracy <--rambling

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 12:12 PM

This site makes me happy :-)

Meg ... keep up the good work!!!

Finn and Theo ... keep up the good commentary.

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 01:00 PM

wait...can you hear it in the distance....a small 6 year old boy is fainting due to his life being mortally wounded from hearing his chest is called a rack...but wait... there's another sound of his parent's heads exploding.

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 01:18 PM

For some reason, this particular link's image doesn't open in a new window. Aww, the little kangaroo's cuteness is deadly though.

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 02:13 PM

This obscenely cute baby animal is causing me to NOT work very hard at all. I keep checking on him. Yup, he's still cute. Be back in a minute...

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 02:58 PM

Men don't have breasts? Guess http://www.ratemymanboobies.com is going to have to shut down... Oh and I WANT THAT ROO

 |  Feb 08, 2006 at 04:53 PM

Awww!!! I love the proportionally big eyes of that li'l roo.

(And I'll pretend that the guy doesn't actually have "moobs". A chest more like Matthew McConaughey's. Yeah, that would work. :-)

 |  Feb 09, 2006 at 05:14 AM

Adorable!! Nipples would make it better, but I still love this pic.

 |  Feb 09, 2006 at 07:45 AM

"Rackne" anyone?

 |  Feb 09, 2006 at 06:31 PM

The roo lashes...the roo lashes...*explodes from the cuteness*

 |  Feb 10, 2006 at 06:08 AM

I wanna baby animal to carry around in my shirt! It shall be my squishy.

 |  Feb 10, 2006 at 08:48 AM

Just as some creatures can be so ugly they're cute, so too can some people write such egregious garbage which, once read in context, becomes sublime. Irony is a many-splendored thing.

 |  Feb 10, 2006 at 07:30 PM

Oh, c'mon there, lighten up a bit!

It's not just the 'roo lips, it's the nose... ultra-cuteness defined.

E. Collison
 |  Feb 11, 2006 at 12:20 AM

Yeah, sauer's right. Keep this blog family-safe. sauer would never ever post inappropriate content in a public forum. *rolls eyes*

Meg's blog, Meg's rules. Anyone who doesn't like them is within their rights to leave.

Who could object to this picture? Dude's just carrying the little guy in whatever pouch-like structure he can supply -- just like Nature intended it.

 |  Feb 13, 2006 at 11:09 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

« "Like, totally Bok!" | Home | Rule #16—Shoot. Nevermind. »




  • Receive the daily content of CuteOverload in your email box. Free!

    Your email address will only be used for this purpose and not given out to any other third party.

    Enter your Email

    Powered by FeedBlitz

Cute Caps!

  • Did you know you can add CuteCaps to your own webpage? Try it!

Got Cute?

  • Think you have a cute photo, Punk? [Clint Eastwood voice] If you think it fits our seriously stringent requirements, send it to us. We just might post it! But if we don't, it's really for the best [patting your back.]

Choosey bloggers choose:

  • TypePad!

    If TypePad helps your blog survive a Slashdotting, you know it's strong.

    Set Up Your Blog For Free with TypePad! If I can do it, you tewtelly can.

Email Me

  • press-related: press [at] cutelabs.com
  • business-related: meg [at] cutelabs.com
  • submissions: cuteoverload [at] frostdesign.net

Press Coverageses

  • Don't miss our Press page for ALL pattings on the back!


Powered by TypePad